A Little About Brewton-Parker; the Athanasian Creed; the Flaming Toilet of Death

Did a special Jumbo Edition of Radio Free Geneva yesterday, addressing three primary topics: first, the John 3:16 Conference from a few weeks ago; second, Greg Boyd’s attack upon “PSA,” i.e., penal substitutionary atonement (lots of parallels to the arguments Muslims use); and finally, a full review of Peter Lumpkin’s booklet on Calvinism. Don your “Calvin is my Homeboy” t-shirt

OK, I was going to divide the program up evenly, with 45 minutes on each topic, but…I lost track of time and ended up going one hour on my review of Pastor Rogers’ anti-Calvinism book, and only thirty minutes finishing up listening to the cross-ex with Abdullah Kunde on Surah 5:44ff. Next week I intend to get back to the

   Well, definitely an interesting program today. Started out with Karl Keating’s e-letter and some stuff about comments on Jimmy Akin’s blog. Then we talked about the PCUSA moving to adopt new terminology for the Trinity, like “Mother, Child, and Womb.” I’m not making this up. Then I looked at Greg Boyd’s attempt to get around John 9. Then, in response

Examined and responded to Roger Olson’s rather weak attempt to deflect the charge of Marcionism (found here), and then finally got to at least halfway through Austin Fischer’s opening statement in the recent “Calvinism” debate. I will be in Boulder, Colorado on Thursday, and I am uncertain of what Rich’s plans are, so keep an eye out! Here is the

We had been hearing about the arrival of Roger Olson’s book, Against Calvinism, for quite some time. It happened to arrive just before I left for Australia, so I did not have time to do much more than review his comments on 1 Timothy 2:4 (here). I have now returned home, so I got his book recorded to mp3 and

I decided to jump on the opportunity to address the issues raised in last week’s Unbelievable Radio Programme (see how I used the British spelling?) when K. Scott Oliphint from Westminster Seminary dialogued with Kurt Jaros, a proponent of a “natural theology” method. We will finish up reviewing the program, Lord willing, tomorrow, when I try to do my first

James analyzes Ignatius’ letter to the Smyrnaeans in light of the Roman Catholic claim that all of the early church fathers (ECFs) believed in the Real Presence, with a careful look at the differences that exists between the Real Presence, the word “eucharist,” and transubstantiation.

Started off responding to comments by a British fellow on FaceBook regarding my sermons this past week, all of which were on the topic of, or touched upon, homosexuality. Then I read Michael Brown’s excellent article on the heartbreaking results of artificial insemination on the lives of those who are born of the procedure, including a poem that truly communicates