Potpourri Max!

Well, I thought I would spend some time talking about the Gregg debate, but as soon as the intro music finished, I looked at my little tablet pc, which has our phone system software running on it, and who is the first caller, but Nadir Ahmed. And the attached description of the call is about why he won’t be doing

I was riding northbound last Saturday morning listening to a debate which took place a few years ago between our good friend Sam Shamoun and Islamic apologist Shabir Ally. I have been collecting Ally’s on-line materials of late, and had been horrendously frustrated at the men he has chosen to debate. Up until listening to Sam’s debate, I simply hadn’t

We finished off our review of the George/Beckwith ecumenical dialogue at that time.

   Back from Toronto, just trying to catch up on “life” today. On Tuesday’s Dividing Line I wish to continue looking at Ahmed Deedat’s attempt to find Muhammad in John 14 and 16, but I was thinking that sometimes the “Deedat Effect” gets lost when I start and stop his presentation and point out all the errors in the process. So,

Continued our review of Norman Geisler’s “Why I am Not a Five Point Calvinist” sermon today, but at the beginning we covered another example of the bankruptcy of Roman Catholic apologetics today in the wild-eyed behavior of Matthew Bellisario and others.

Today John Samson continues his review of the TULIP and focuses on Unconditional Election.